Oliver
New member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2024
- Messages
- 17
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 3
Hello everyone,
I'm currently developing a project that involves localizing a robot within a pre-mapped indoor environment. The setup includes wheel encoders and 3D lidar. I've already created a 3D pointcloud map of the area, and I'm planning to use an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) for positioning the robot. The encoder data updates at a frequency of 10Hz, while the lidar data, after preprocessing, updates at about 3-4Hz. I'm incorporating the encoder data in the prediction phase, and using the lidar data in the update phase of the EKF. Do you think this approach is effective? I'd appreciate any suggestions or improvements you might have. Thanks in advance for your help!
I'm currently developing a project that involves localizing a robot within a pre-mapped indoor environment. The setup includes wheel encoders and 3D lidar. I've already created a 3D pointcloud map of the area, and I'm planning to use an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) for positioning the robot. The encoder data updates at a frequency of 10Hz, while the lidar data, after preprocessing, updates at about 3-4Hz. I'm incorporating the encoder data in the prediction phase, and using the lidar data in the update phase of the EKF. Do you think this approach is effective? I'd appreciate any suggestions or improvements you might have. Thanks in advance for your help!